Prediction of Nell Hopman vs Alison Hattersley Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hopman vs A. Hattersley

Nell Hopman

AUS

6

Win

Played

0

Win

116

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Alison Hattersley

AUS

6

Win

Played

0

Win

116

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hopman 6 - 0 Hattersley

They have played 18 sets in total, with Nell Hopman winning 16 and Alison Hattersley winning 2. The last match between Nell Hopman and Alison Hattersley was at the Sydney Hard, 26-08-1949, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Nell Hopman getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hopman	6
Hattersley	0

Last 8 H2H Matches:

(R4) Sydney Hard(08-26-49)

Stats

Nell Hopman

Alison Hattersley

(R4) Australian Championships(01-17-47)

Stats

Nell Hopman

Alison Hattersley

() Australian Championships(01-19-40)

Stats

Nell Hopman

Alison Hattersley

N. Hopman vs A. Hattersley H2H Profile

N. Hopman	Stats	A. Hattersley
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.93% (312-256)	Career Total W/L	49.19% (91-94)
1	Clay	0
5	Grass	0
6	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Hopman vs A. Hattersley Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nell Hopman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Alison Hattersley has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nell Hopman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alison Hattersley has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nell Hopman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alison Hattersley has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nell Hopman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Alison Hattersley winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nell Hopman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 64% (W/L 46/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 40/60). Alison Hattersley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 3/2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 47% (W/L 29/33).
Player level: In the last year, Nell Hopman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Alison Hattersley has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 8 times before with Nell Hopman winning 8 times and Alison Hattersley being victorious 0 times. They have played 18 sets in total, with Nell Hopman winning 16 and Alison Hattersley winning 2.
The last match between Nell Hopman and Alison Hattersley was at the Sydney Hard, 26-08-1949, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Nell Hopman getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nell Hopman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Alison Hattersley has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nell Hopman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alison Hattersley has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nell Hopman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alison Hattersley has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nell Hopman vs Alison Hattersley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Hopman vs A. Hattersley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Hopman	Stats	A. Hattersley
8	H2H Matches Won	0
16	Sets Won	2
104	Games Won	59
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (8/8)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/8)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (7/7)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/7)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Hopman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berkeley - 26-09-1966
R3 Diana GaiD. Gai	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Los Angeles - 15-09-1966
R3 Ingrid BentzerI. Bentzer	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Knokke - 08-08-1966
R4 Michele KahnM. Kahn	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Hilversum - 18-07-1966
R3 Lidy VenneboerL. Venneboer	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Bastad - 03-07-1966
R4 Liv HubertL. Hubert	L	6-2 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

A. Hattersley Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Championships - 16-01-1958
R4 Fay MullerF. Muller	L	8-6 6-1	Stats
R3 Judy TegartJ. Tegart	W	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Sydney - 06-11-1957
R2 V MccarthyV. Mccarthy	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Sydney - 07-11-1956
R3 Ruia MorrisonR. Morrison	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Australian Championships - 23-01-1954
R3 Helen AngwinH. Angwin	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Hopman vs A. Hattersley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Hopman	Stats	A. Hattersley
54.93% (312/256)	YTD Win/Loss	49.19% (91/94)
54.54% (685/571)	Sets Win/Loss	48.92% (203/212)
52.62% (5895/5307)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (2119/0)
54.55% (18/15)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
40.00% (40/60)	Clay Win/Loss	60.00% (3/2)
57.30% (208/155)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (59/59)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
50.43% (59/58)	Slam W/L	47.06% (8/9)
54% (297/548)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (87/179)
50% (1/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
43% (66/152)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (27/56)
83% (316/263)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (92/75)
17% (316/53)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (92/17)
16% (236/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (88/12)